John Murray for Paedobaptism even if it demanded Paedocommunion

It is objected that paedobaptists are strangely inconsistent in dispensing baptism to infants and yet refusing to admit them to the Lord’s Table …

At the outset it should be admitted that if paedobaptists are inconsistent in this discrimination, then the relinquishment of infant baptism is not the only way of resolving the inconsistency. It could be resolved by going in the other direction, namely, that of admitting infants to the Lord’s Supper.

And when all factors entering into this dispute are taken into account, particularly the principle involved in infant baptism, then far less would be at stake in admitting infants to the Lord’s Supper than would be at stake in abandoning infant baptism.

This will serve to point up the significance of infant baptism in the divine economy of grace

[John Murray, Christian Baptism (Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1980). pp. 73-74; emphasis added. Note that John Murray opposed paedocommunion.]

The City of God(ly Humanity)

And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God.”

Revelation 21:2-3 ESV

Many readers think the City is something that exists at or after the end of the world and/or after death. This is understandable. The next verse says there is no longer any death in this city.

Ultimately, the new Jerusalem, won’t be perfectly realized until after the resurrection, but I don’t think that means it is nothing but a future hope. My main concern here is that people assume, whatever their eschatology, that the city is simply a heavenly creation given to us like manna was given in the desert or Jesus gave blind men their sight.

Continue reading “The City of God(ly Humanity)”

Election and Union: Eph 1:3-14

I think most people read Ephesians 1:3-14 as an overflowing of verbiage, powerful statements lacking any coherent order.

I propose that the passage is quite organized. It has an initial statement (vv. 3, 4) and then two re-statements (vv. 5-10; 11-14). The first of these re-statements has a tw0-part structure (vv. 5-6, 7-10).

Here is the text:

Continue reading “Election and Union: Eph 1:3-14”

In Thick Darkness

When Solomon finished building the Temple in Jerusalem, we read that

And when the priests came out of the Holy Place, a cloud filled the house of the LORD, so that the priests could not stand to minister because of the cloud, for the glory of the LORD filled the house of the LORD. Then Solomon said, “The LORD has said that he would dwell in thick darkness. I have indeed built you an exalted house, a place for you to dwell in forever.”

1 Kings 8:10–13 ESV

Question: When and where did God say this?

Continue reading “In Thick Darkness”

What is the “Gospel”?

Consider this piece of political propaganda from the Greco-Roman world. Listen as I read from an inscription about the birthday of Augustus Caesar the emperor of Rome that was dates from 9BC.

The providence which has ordered the whole of our life, showing concern and zeal, has ordained the most perfect consummation for human life by giving to it Augustus, by filling him with virtue for doing the work of a benefactor among men, and by sending in him, as it were, a deliverer for us and those who come after us, to make war to cease, to create order everywhere. . . . ; the birthday of the god [Augustus] was the beginning for the world of the gospel that has come to men through him [found in What Saint Paul Really Said by N. T. Wright].

THE TERM GOSPEL IS a corruption of the Anglo-Saxon word godspell. It is used to translate the Greek word evangel which means “good news,” “glad tidings,” or “joyful message.” And it is a word with an important use in the pagan politics of the first century. It refers to a royal proclamation or an imperial announcement. It is used to describe a report of the birth, or the ascension to the throne, or the victory of a king. In some cases it can refer to more than one of these, since the victory of an aspiring prince can also count as his coronation. By defeating his enemy, he inherits the kingdom and thus becomes a king. Such a declaration is described as a gospel in the ancient world of the first-century Mediterranean region.

Continue reading “What is the “Gospel”?”

The Bible’s Plant Analogies Are Meant to Provoke Action

Then Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region about the Jordan were going out to him, and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins. But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Bear fruit in keeping with repentance. And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham. Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.

Matthew 3:5–10 ESV

So writes Matthew about the message and actions of John the Baptizer. Notice his purpose in speaking of a tree and it’s fruit. John wants people to repent of their sins and engage in new obedience. Claiming to be Abraham’s descendants is not enough. They have to, to borrow the language of the Apostle Paul, “also walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Abraham had” (Romans 4:12).

Continue reading “The Bible’s Plant Analogies Are Meant to Provoke Action”

Don’t Feed (Your Ego) on the Weak: Paul’s Paradoxical Wisdom in Galatians 6:2-5

Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ. For if anyone thinks he is something, when he is nothing, he deceives himself. But let each one test his own work, and then his reason to boast will be in himself alone and not in his neighbor. For each will have to bear his own load.

Galatians 6:2–5 ESV

I preached on Galatians 6:1-5 many years ago. At the time, I gave most of my attention to verse 1 (“Brothers, if anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness. Keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted.”) I argued that the first verse implied that the “burdens” that Paul had in mind were the consequences of being sinned against or dealing with sin in the Church in terms of the work that it required, the risks that one had to face (temptation), or the stigma of shame in the community.

Continue reading “Don’t Feed (Your Ego) on the Weak: Paul’s Paradoxical Wisdom in Galatians 6:2-5”

Paul’s Paradoxical Wisdom of the Christian Life

I’m not sure if there are “Dune nerds” any more but that has been a thing in the past.

THE FEAR LITANY

A Dune nerd wasn’t merely someone who read or even appreciated Frank Herbert’s science fiction novel, Dune. It was someone who was able to recite the “Litany against Fear” and enjoyed doing so:

“I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

Continue reading “Paul’s Paradoxical Wisdom of the Christian Life”

Solomon’s Wisdom Explains Why Neera Tanden Won’t Be Confirmed

(Originally posted on March 9, 2021 at Townhall.com)

Last week Team Biden withdrew the nomination of Neera Tanden as Director of the Office of Management and Budget. The media reported that she would be appointed to another position in the Administration, just not one requiring Senate approval. This is a political story but it is a lesson for many of us in our financial and other life endeavors. Tanden had offended enough Senators through her Twitter account that she failed to gain majority support.

While the right of free speech seems simple, it’s actually quite complex. A guarantee that the civil government will not punish you for anything you say may be significant, but it also may induce a false sense of security. If everyone in society is free to respond to your words, then unpopular speech could have serious consequences without government reprisals of any kind or without any violence at all. Letting one’s faith in government passivity induce euphoric utterances without care or caution would mean ignoring other consequences.

Continue reading “Solomon’s Wisdom Explains Why Neera Tanden Won’t Be Confirmed”